Redesign - Revision history

Martini at 02:35, 18 July 2017

2017-07-18T02:35:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 18 July 2017
Line 32:		Line 32:
	'''prokushev:'''		'''prokushev:'''
	Only thing not clear for me its why to have two menu system? It brings problem to navigation...		Only thing not clear for me its why to have two menu system? It brings problem to navigation...

			[[Category:Netlabs]]

2004-10-25T06:29:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 25 October 2004
Line 31:		Line 31:

	'''prokushev:'''		'''prokushev:'''
	Only thing not clear for me its why to have two menu system? It brings problem to navigation...		Only thing not clear for me its why to have two menu system? It brings problem to navigation...

2004-10-25T06:28:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 25 October 2004
Line 29:		Line 29:
	ktk> should work actually		ktk> should work actually
	12:34> <hughwork_> i.e. barrier free		12:34> <hughwork_> i.e. barrier free

			'''prokushev:'''
			Only thing not clear for me its why to have two menu system? It brings problem to navigation...

2004-10-15T17:52:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 15 October 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	http://dev.stage.salesemotion.de/netlabs/netlabs.jpg		http://dev.stage.salesemotion.de/netlabs/netlabs.jpg

			[http://dev.stage.salesemotion.de/netlabs/netlabs1.jpg (previous version)]

			----

	'''Comments welcome ;)'''		'''Comments welcome ;)'''

	'''Cinc:''' Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.		'''TheSeer:'''
	But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?		Okay, updated version. The Header is smaller, the background color is ligther and thus the main text color changed to black for readability
			For the "flattness" of the menu - we'll see what looks good.. I'm not too convinced an actual dropshadow will fit into the layout...
			<br/>@hugh: The gfx stuff has nothing to do with textual content for textbased browsers. It'll be xhtml/css code later and thus should be viewable
			with any somewhat standard compliant browser ( e.g. IE might not display a thing <just kidding> )


			'''Cinc:'''
			Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.
			But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small
			soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?

	'''hugh:'''		'''hugh:'''

2004-10-12T10:30:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 12 October 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Cinc:''' Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.		'''Cinc:''' Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.
	But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?		But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?

			'''hugh:'''
			12:31> <hughwork_> ktk as for the design I miss some visual barrier around the content
			ktk> yes gave that feedback as well already
			ktk> probably another color for the background
			ktk> also the contrast is not that good
			12:31> <hughwork_> yeah
			12:33> <hughwork_> well maybe that could be resolved providing other css
			12:34> <hughwork_> and I hope it's usable with a text browser
			ktk> should work actually
			12:34> <hughwork_> i.e. barrier free

2004-10-11T07:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 11 October 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Comments welcome ;)'''		'''Comments welcome ;)'''

	Cinc: Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.		'''Cinc:''' Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.
	But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?		But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?

2004-10-11T07:31:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 11 October 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	'''Comments welcome ;)'''		'''Comments welcome ;)'''

			Cinc: Looks rather good to me. The old design seems old fashioned when compared. Colors are nice.
			But it appears kind of 'flat' to me. The top part with the background pic is ok but the rest looks like it's mot yet finished. Maybe a small soft shadow around the sections to spice them up?

2004-10-08T17:12:13Z

New page

http://dev.stage.salesemotion.de/netlabs/netlabs.jpg

'''Comments welcome ;)'''