Jump to content

Voyager: Difference between revisions

From NikiWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
* http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/glitz and http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2004-November/004358.html
* http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/glitz and http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2004-November/004358.html
* [http://www.gnustep.org/ GNUstep.org]
* [http://www.gnustep.org/ GNUstep.org]
== Design Decisions ==
Creating a binary compatible OS/2 clone may be tempting but is not strictly necessary. Important is the user experience. Which toolkit should be used for primary development?
*GTK+
*GnuStep (look at Apples programs to see what's possible. Yes I know Apple uses Cocoa not Gnustep)
*other?
Dropping SOM for something better? Creating a poor mans SOM kernel isn't too difficult.

Revision as of 17:40, 22 October 2005

Documentation

IBM Redbooks

  • SG24-4630-00 OS/2 Warp (PowerPC Edition) A First Look
  • SG24-4639-00 OS/2 Warp (PowerPC Edition) Graphical Subsystem

We do have the first one digitaly, but not the second one. In case anyone finds that, let us know.

Darwin Documentation

There is plenty of documentation available about Darwin, a good start is Kernel Programming, which gives a nice overview about the design of the kernel.

Technologies to study

Design Decisions

Creating a binary compatible OS/2 clone may be tempting but is not strictly necessary. Important is the user experience. Which toolkit should be used for primary development?

  • GTK+
  • GnuStep (look at Apples programs to see what's possible. Yes I know Apple uses Cocoa not Gnustep)
  • other?

Dropping SOM for something better? Creating a poor mans SOM kernel isn't too difficult.